WELCOME TO FRIENDS OF PRASAR BHARATI

 
Home Membership About Prasar Bharati Significance of Prasar Bharati About Friends of Prasar Bharati
What you can say  What you can do Recent news Responsibility of Public Service Broadcasting

 Up loaded on Monday July 18, 2011

 
Prasar paid crores for unwanted services

Source:http://www.sunday-guardian.com/investigation/prasar-paid-crores-for-unwanted-services

   
 
YATISH YADAV  New Delhi | 17th Jul
 

A copy of the 2009 Finance Department note mentioning the discrepancies in the deal with Intesat.

rasar Bharati has been showering undue favours on Intelsat Corporation, an American company that made satellite arrangements to provide a European beam, an Indian beam and a US link to India's public service broadcaster. The favours came primarily in two forms: paying Intelsat Rs 18 cr more than the contracted amount; and extending its services in spite of objections from the Finance Department and even though ISRO was providing the same services for half the rate.

Prasar Bharati paid approximately Rs 300 cr to Intelsat, earlier known as PanAmSat, from 1995 onward for a period of 15 years. Prasar kept depositing the "withholding tax" with the tax authorities on behalf of Intelsat ever since that tax became payable. The utilization of the services provided by Intelsat was negligible. The scandal first came to light in 2009 when the Finance Department of Prasar Bharati mentioned about it in a note dated 13/03/09. A copy of the note is with The Sunday Guardian.

A copy of B.S. Lalli’s internal note to Director General Aruna Sharma in September 2009.

 

"However, such tax should have been deducted from the contracted payment to be made to the party. Instead the payments have been made in addition to the contracted amount resulting in excess payments running into crores," the note says.

The then Prasar CEO B.S. Lalli was informed that an excess payment of Rs 18 cr had been made to Intelsat. Lalli in his internal note to Director General Aruna Sharma in September 2009 expressed his shock and asked for a report. "It is indeed somewhat of a surprise that an Agreement for such a long period of time was executed then. There is logic in the arguments that as to why should Doordarshan pay the Income tax while the Income is going to Intelsat," Lalli's letter added.

But when the contract between Doordarshan and Intelsat was about to expire in September 2010, both Sharma and Lalli granted the American company an extension of six months, up to March 2011, on the basis of a single party enquiry. This was done when the row over tax liability had not been settled and was being pursued with the Income Tax Department. A note sent by Member (Finance) dated 26 August 2010, objected to the proposed extension by saying, "Financial rules do not permit approval of any agreement with Intelsat or any other party based on a single party enquiry without going through a proper procedure of open tendering."

Minutes of the Prasar board meeting and several documents accessed by this newspaper show that there was deliberate delay on the part of the authorities to sort out the tax issue. Earlier in 2009 Lalli referred the matter to Solicitor General (SG) Gopal Subramanium for advice. The SG through his letter dated 02/09/09 said that while payments should be released to Intelsat, possibilities should be explored to recover dues through the Income Tax Department.

The matter was taken up by the Prasar board on 3 January 2011 where it was pointed out that alternate satellite arrangements to meet Doordarshan's urgent requirements had already been made through ISRO at almost half the cost.

It was also pointed out that it was essential to settle the tax liability issue before releasing any payment to Intelsat. Prasar has been issuing TDS certificates and any excess credits obtained by Intelsat from the tax authority were to be adjusted in its favour.

The board, however, ignored the matter and CEO Rajiv Takru ordered the release of Rs 14.91 cr. This was released on 1 March 2011 to the Income Tax Department to the credit of Intelsat.

The Sunday Guardian has also accessed the income tax assessment order of the American company, where it has under declared its income for the year 2006-2007. The Income-Tax Department has levied tax at the rate of 10% on revenues, whereas Prasar has been depositing tax at 11.1% rate all these years. So 1.1% excess tax was deposited by Prasar all these years.

The Finance Department of Prasar suggested that it needed to adjust the excess withholding tax deposited for Intelsat before releasing any fresh payment. The scandal was also reported to the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting but no action has been taken in this case so far.

Sources told The Sunday Guardian that certain officials wanted Intelsat to derive financial benefits from the deal. "Services were reviewed and to reduce cost it was decided that just one satellite would be hired. Since the utilization of

Intelsat services was low, and there were hardly any viewers in western country for Doordarshan programmes, a proposal to revive programming was discussed. And in future when we get the viewers in Europe and America we may hire point to point service through optic links," sources added.

 

 

 

 

|||||| Thank you for your interest.||||||