Free Prasar Bharati
from government control
source:http://newindianexpress.com/editorials/article1451247.ece
|
By
The New Indian Express 06th February 2013
The appointment of Sam Pitroda as head of a high-level committee to
suggest measures to make Doordarshan and Akashvani more popular seems to
be an exercise in futility. Bringing the two under Prasar Bharati, an
‘autonomous’ body, was an attempt to liberate them from the government’s
control. Far from that, they remained firmly under the control of the
government. Today Prasar Bharati accounts for two-thirds of the
information and broadcasting ministry’s annual budget. With the popularity
of Doordarshan and All India Radio decreasing year by year, Prasar Bharati
is increasingly becoming a white elephant. The recommendations of the
Sengupta, Bakshi and Narayanamurthy committees, which had earlier studied
the functioning of Prasar Bharati, remain unimplemented. That is why
Pitroda’s appointment does not instil confidence.
Any news organisation, which is directly under the government, and has to
take orders from the government functionaries, whether political or
bureaucratic, will not carry conviction with the people. The Prasar
Bharati experiment has turned out to be a complete failure. Since the
corporation draws money from the government and its officials are drawn
from government cadre, it cannot exercise even a semblance of autonomy. It
is no better than an adjunct of the government.
As long as Prasar
Bharati remains tied to the government, there is no redemption for the
organisation. The British Broadcasting Corporation provides an example
of how a public service broadcaster can be run. Instead of drawing money
directly from the government, a licence fee can be collected from all
owners of television receivers, as is done in the case of motor vehicles,
to run Prasar Bharati. Until the Seventies, the government used to
collect a radio fee. Liberated from government dependence and staffed by
professionals, Prasar Bharati should be able to show greater
professionalism in both production and presentation of programmes. It can
also set standards for the ever-increasing private radio and television
channels.
|||||| Thank you for your interest.||||||
|